530

June 20, 2018 | Author: Anonymous | Category: Каталог , Без категории
Share Embed


Short Description

Download 530 ...

Description

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, VOL. 33, 473È479 (1998)

Poly(ethylene glycol) Limits of Detection Using Internal Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry Salvador J. Pastor, Sylvia H. Wood and Charles L. Wilkins* Department of Chemistry, University of CaliforniaÈRiverside, Riverside, California 92521, USA

Detection limits of poly(ethylene glycol) were examined in the mass range 2000–6000 Da. Using an aerospray sample deposition technique, highly uniform sample surfaces were produced. This method allows signal averaging of spectra from up to 400 shots on the same sample spot. It is found that, as the material available for desorption is decreased, the overall average sample consumption per shot is decreased. Experimentally determined detection limits of 40 and 280 fmol (based on the average molecular masses of 2000 and 6000) were found for PEG 2000 and PEG 6000, respectively. The sample spectra show oligomer distributions in agreement with their higher concentration counterparts. However, at the lowest signal-to-noise levels, oligomers at the extremes of the distribution are no longer detected, making the polymer distribution appear to be narrower in mass range. ( 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Mass Spectrom. 33, 473È479 (1998) KEYWORDS : poly(ethylene glycol) ; polymers ; sensitivity ; Fourier-transform mass spectrometry ; Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance ; matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization

INTRODUCTION Mass spectrometric detection limits for peptides and proteins have been of interest for a number of years. This stems from the fact that bioanalytical techniques are moving to the sub-cellular level, and mass spectrometry can be a fast and highly sensitive method. In fact, femtomole detection by time-of-Ñight (TOF) and Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS) is not uncommon, with attomole detection possible in favorable cases.1h6 However, there is only limited information available regarding mass spectral detection limits for polymers. Most recent studies have focused on the equally important issue of analyzing polymers without mass discrimination. There are few cases when the amount of polymer material analyzed is mentioned. In that research, sample sizes included 100 ng of polymer by quadrupole mass spectrometry,7 a 2 pmol polymer sample [of which less than 1% was consumed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)TOF],8 100 pmol of polymer (on a probe tip) using MALDI/TOF9,10 and 0.1 nmol of polymer (on a probe tip) using MALDI/TOF.11,12 Hence, there is a

* Correspondence to : C. L. Wilkins, Department of Chemistry, University of CaliforniaÈRiverside, Riverside, California 92521, USA. Contract/grant sponsor : National Science Foundation ; Contract/ grant number : CHE-92-01277. Contract/grant sponsor : National Institute of Health ; Contract/ grant number : GM-44606.

CCC 1076È5174/98/050473È07 $17.50 ( 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

need for more deÐnitive studies of sample quantities required for mass spectral polymer analysis. With the recent increased interest in the study of polymers by mass spectrometry, MALDI in particular, researchers have been able to provide much information of use to those investigating polymer synthesis strategies. For example, polymer molecular mass distributions, end-groups and even structural information is now readily available by MS, providing chemists with new insight into creating polymers for speciÐc applications. Because exploratory synthetic strategies sometimes yield limited sample quantities for evaluation, it is necessary to use more sensitive analytical methods or smarter sample preparation strategies. A difficulty with polymer analysis is that the mass spectral signal is spread out over an oligomer distribution rather than concentrated into a few ions, as is the case for pure compounds not occurring in mixtures. Thus, a polymer with a low polydispersity and containing 30 oligomers within its distribution will show relatively lower ion abundances than a single pure compound of similar concentration. Furthermore, polymer spectra are often complicated by the presence of ion sequences resulting from both sodium and potassium adduction. FTMS has been established to be capable of polymer analysis including both polar and non-polar polymers,13h16 without mass discrimination.13,17,18 The FTMS trapped ion technique allows for a multitude of experimental possibilities including ion dissociation and high resolution analysis. Here detection limits for a popular class of polar polymers [poly(ethylene glycols)] are examined. Received 10 December 1997 Accepted 4 February 1998

474

S. J. PASTOR, S. H. WOOD AND C. L. WILKINS

Figure 1. Scanning electron microscope image of a PEG 2000 sample. The image shows microfine particles produced by the aerospray technique. Laser spot size, 80 Ã 210 lm.

A Fourier transform mass spectrometer (Finnigan, Madison, WI, USA) equipped with a 7.05 T superconducting magnet (Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK) was used for all experiments. As described previously,13 internal MALDI ion generation was accomplished using a 337 nm nitrogen laser (PTI Canada, London, ON, Canada) and associated optics. Samples were placed on a 16.5 mm removable stainless-steel probe tip that was positioned 4 mm on the outside of the cubic source cell trapping plate via a manual insertion probe. This internal MALDI arrangement eliminates potential discrimination from ion transport to the analysis cell and gives maximum ion throughout. The background pressure during the experiments described here was 8 ] 10~8 Torr (1 Torr \ 133.3 Pa), achieved by the use of two Edwards di†usion pumps (Di†stak Model 100, Edwards High Vacuum Crawley, West Sussex, UK). Experimental control and data were acquired using a Sun Sparc data station running Odyssey program software version 3.1 (Finnigan).

These samples were each dissolved in 1 ml of methanol. From each stock solution, a 200 ll aliquot was aerosprayed on to the rotating sample probe tip. For detection limit studies, subsequent samples were successively diluted from more concentrated samples by 1/10 dilution of the previous sample. For calculation of molar quantities, the average masses of the two polymer samples were used. Thus, before analysis, the PEG 2000 sample probe tips had 5.1 ] 10~7, 5.1 ] 10~8, 5.1 ] 10~9 and 5.1 ] 10~10 mol of material loaded and the PEG 6000 sample probe tips had 3.6 ] 10~7, 3.6 ] 10~8 and 3.6 ] 10~9 mol of polymer loaded. Calculations for detection limits assume that there was no signiÐcant overspray of the sample solution. The aerospray technique for sample deposition has been described previously19 and was Ðrst reported as an alternative sample preparation technique as early as 1992.14,15 Because the solution is sprayed, the result is microÐne crystals with a highly uniform surface. This permits excellent sample shot-to-shot reproducibility. As an alternative, poly(ethylene glycol) was mixed with the matrix and water as the solvent, and it was deposited in the channel of a grooved probe tip of Ðxed geometry. Crystals resulted from evaporation of this solvent mixture.

Sample preparation

Experimental sequence

For the poly(ethylene glycol) 2000 (PEG 2000) sample (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) of average molecular mass 2000 and the PEG 6000 sample (Fluka) of average molecular mass 6000, 5.1 and 10.8 mg, respectively, were weighed out and mixed in a 1 : 400 (analyte : matrix) ratio with 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) (Fluka).

For consistency, with the exception of deceleration time, the same experimental conditions were used for all analyses in the present study. The signal for PEG 2000 was optimized prior to the concentration study. MALDI ions were decelerated for 115 ls (PEG 2000) and 170 ls (PEG 6000) using a gated trapping tech-

EXPERIMENTAL Instrumentation

( 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, VOL. 33, 473È479 (1998)

MALDI/FTMS DETECTION LIMITS FOR POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL)

475

Figure 2. Example spectra of 5.1 Ã 10É7, 5.1 Ã 10É8, 5.1 Ã 10É9 and 5.1 Ã 10É10 mol of PEG 2000 loaded on to the probe tip. The material present on the probe allowed for signal averaging in the following amounts : (a) 400, (b) 100, (c) 20 and (d) 4 shots.

nique.20,21 Following ion deceleration, a 100 ms delay was imposed to allow sufficient sodium cationization and ion relaxation. For spectral observation, ions were excited to a radius of ca. 1.0 cm using the SWIFT excitation procedure. A higher radius produced distortions within the distribution and eventual loss of ions ; a lower radius produced lower signal levels. A PEG 6000 sample conÐrmed the use of a 1.0 cm radius for best results in obtaining near-Gaussian molecular mass distributions and maximum signal intensity. Detection was done at a bandwidth of 400 kHz with 64K data points and 9 dB of attenuation. A 1.0 s quench ended each measurement, and there was a 100 ms delay before each ( 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

subsequent experiment. All mass spectra were measured with the trapping plates at 1.0 V. Scanning electron microscopy A Philips Model XL30 scanning electron microscope (Philips Electron Optics, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a Ðeld emission gun was used. An accelerating voltage of 5 kV was applied. Samples were mounted on the specimen holder using adhesive carbon tape. No coating was applied to the sample. Imaging was done using a secondary electron detector. JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, VOL. 33, 473È479 (1998)

476

S. J. PASTOR, S. H. WOOD AND C. L. WILKINS

Figure 3. Plot of signal intensity vs . sample consumed per shot (in femtomoles) for PEG 2000.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Aerospray vs. dried-drop method The beneÐts of using the aerospray technique for sample deposition over the dried-drop method are quicker sample preparations, more homogeneous surfaces and smaller crystal formation. An example sample preparation is shown in Fig. 1. MicroÐne crystals formed are clearly visible, as is the laser spot (80 ] 210 lm). Solution sprayed from the aerospray quickly evaporates solvent and leaves the crystals to self-stack. Slight valleys and elevated regions are visible where the surface is built upwards. It was found that the dried-drop method produced larger crystals in selected areas of the probe tip. For example, the channel probe tip su†ered from crystal formation along the top edge of the groove when a volatile solvent such as methanol was used. Also, because the crystals grow by association, the laser desorption mass spectral signal can Ñuctuate from shot to shot as one searches for a “good spot.Ï Thus, for reproducibility reasons and because of the desire to signal average on a single spot, the dried-drop method was abandoned in favor of the aerospray technique for polymer deposition. Additional beneÐts of the aerospray technique may be good analyte crystallization with the matrix. A topic of debate has been the spatial location of the analyte, matrix and metal salts within the crystal, so called Marangoni e†ects.22h24 In addition, depending on when ionization occurs, before the laser pulse or immediately after and close to the surface, the proximity of the analyte to the cationizing agent could prove crucial in obtaining usable signal intensities. ( 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Experimental detection limits Laser desorption mass spectra of PEG normally show cationization with sodium. However, this can easily be converted to cationization with any other metal by addition of the appropriate metal salts to the matrix. Figure 2 shows spectra of sodiated oligomers from a PEG 2000 sample that was acquired using MALDI/ FTMS. In Fig. 2(a) is a near-Gaussian distribution that extends from 1500 to almost 3000 Da. Figure 2(a)È(d) are spectra obtained from samples where 5.1 ] 10~7, 5.1 ] 10~8, 5.1 ] 10~9 and 5.1 ] 10~10 mol of material were loaded on to the probe tip. Signal averaging on the same spot was done to determine the relative amounts of material present after each dilution step. For example, the probe tip was 5.1 ] 10~7 mol of PEG 2000 loaded [Fig. 2(a)] could be subjected to 400 laser shots on the same spot until the signal was essentially gone. This is in contrast to the probe tip with only 5.1 ] 10~10 mol loaded [Fig. 2(d)], which produced signals only for the Ðrst four laser shots. Hence the number of laser shots required to deplete the sample is related to the sample thickness, since a Ðxed aliquot of 200 ll of solution was deposited in each case. Higher sample concentrations produced thicker sample preparations, allowing more laser shots per spot. A scanning electron microscope was used to determine the laser spot size of 80 ] 210 lm. Knowing the probe tipÏs circular dimensions and assuming that all sample solution was deposited on the probe tip without signiÐcant overspray, a scaling factor of 12 700 was determined. This means that ablated material from the nitrogen laser produces a hole that is 1/12 700 of the total material available for analysis. The maximum number of shots available with each sample preparation was determined experimentally. From these data, the amount of material ablated per shot was determined. JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, VOL. 33, 473È479 (1998)

MALDI/FTMS DETECTION LIMITS FOR POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL)

477

Table 1. Summary of data for PEG 2000 Material on probe (mol)

Probe/laser spot ratio

Material on spot (mol)

No. of scans

Material per shot (fmol)

Average signal per shot

Signal-to-noise ratio for added spectra

5.10 Ã 10É7 5.10 Ã 10É7 5.10 Ã 10É8 5.10 Ã 10É8 5.10 Ã 10É9 5.10 Ã 10É9 5.10 Ã 10É10 5.10 Ã 10É10 5.10 Ã 10É10

12 700 12 700 12 700 12 700 12 700 12 700 12 700 12 700 12 700

4.02 Ã 10É11 4.02 Ã 10É11 4.02 Ã 10É12 4.02 Ã 10É12 4.02 Ã 10É13 4.02 Ã 10É13 4.02 Ã 10É14 4.02 Ã 10É14 4.02 Ã 10É14

300 400 75 100 15 20 4 4 4

134 100 54 40 27 20 10 10 10

270 214 167 132 75 56 21 28 28

483 404 188 184 40 34 5 6 9

Figure 4. Example spectra of 3.6 Ã 10É7, 3.6 Ã 10É8 and 3.6 Ã 10É9 mol of PEG 6000 loaded on to the probe tip. The material present on the probe allowed for signal averaging in the following amounts : (a) 200, (b) 36 and (c) 9 shots. ( 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, VOL. 33, 473È479 (1998)

478

S. J. PASTOR, S. H. WOOD AND C. L. WILKINS

The average of all laser shots, until the sample shot was depleted, was plotted to yield a representative detection limit. Figure 3 is a plot of the signal abundance vs. sample consumed for PEG 2000 from the data in Table 1. The plot shows that when sample is plentiful, more can be consumed on average than in a sample limited situation such a “bad sprayÏ or thin Ðlm application. The result is higher signal intensities and better signal-tonoise ratios. Figure 3 also shows the lowest sample consumption per shot to be 10 fmol for PEG 2000. When spectra resulting from four shots are signal averaged (i.e. 40 fmol consumed), the mass spectrum in Fig. 2(d) is obtained. To obtain signal-to-noise ratios between 5 and 9, consumption of 40 fmol appears to be the lowest detection limit possible for this m/z range. Although it is worthwhile to know that the average molecular mass distribution can still be calculated at this low polymer concentration, the poor signal-to-noise ratio makes it impossible to obtain the true polydispersity of the polymer. The net result of not generating enough ions per laser shot is lowered signal intensities. This is a major limitation for analyzing high-mass polymers by a trapped ion technique. In the case of MALDI, ions are desorbed with signiÐcant translational energies which pose experimental difficulties for trapping. Use of a higher power laser and larger spot sizes would increase ion abundances. However, the energetics of the ion formation process limit mass ranges. Wilkins and coworkers14,25 have shown that singly charged MALDI PEG oligomers up to m/z 14 000 can be observed using a gated trapping technique and a 7 T FTMS system. OÏConner and McLa†erty26 have demonstrated that PEG oligomers with masses up to 23 000 Da can be analyzed by electrospray FTMS. In a second series of experiments, PEG 6000 was examined to see the e†ect of higher mass range on the detection limits of PEG polymers. Figure 4 shows spectral plots of (a) 3.6 ] 10~7 (b) 3.6 ] 10~8 (c) and 3.6 ] 10~9 mol of PEG 6000 loaded on the probe tip. When analyzed as for the PEG 2000 studies, this corresponded to average detection limits per shot of 190, 100

and 31 fmol, respectively. Because the mass spectrum shown in Fig. 4(c) resulted from averaging the spectra from nine laser shots to produce the signal-to-noise ratio of 9 shown, the ultimate detection limit for this PEG mass range is ca. 280 fmol (i.e. 9 ] 31 fmol). Again, it is found that when more sample is present on the probe tip, the average consumption per shot is increased, leading to higher signal intensities.

CONCLUSION A study of MALDI/FTMS detection limits for two poly(ethylene glycol) polymers (PEG 2000 and PEG 6000) was carried out. It was found that, as the amount of material applied to the sample probe tip was decreased, the overall sample material consumed per laser shot was diminished. At low signal-to-noise ratios of between 5 and 9, the total sample consumed was 40 fmol for PEG 2000 and 280 fmol for PEG 6000. The spectra acquired under these conditions exhibit accurate average molecular mass distributions and M values. p inforHowever, they su†er from a loss of end oligomer mation owing to lower signal-to-noise ratios, making the distribution appear narrower. Owing to the symmetry of the distributions, these losses do not have a substantial e†ect upon the calculated averages. The use of an aerospray technique greatly facilitates the analysis of all polymer materials because of the increased reproducibility from shot to shot from a more uniform surface over the dried drop method. At the highest sample concentration depositions, spectra from up to 400 laser shots could be signal averaged from the same probe spot.

Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (Grant CHE-92-01277) and the National Institutes of Health (Grant GM-44606).

REFERENCES 1. S. Jespersen, W. M. A. Niessen, U. R. Tjaden, J. van der Greef, E. Litborn, U. Lindberg and J. Roeraade, Rapid Commun . Mass Spectrom . 8, 581 (1994). 2. H. Zhang, P. E. Andren and R. M. Caprioli, J . Mass Spectrom . 30, 1768 (1995). 3. G. A. Valaskovic, N. L. Kelleher, D. P. Little, D. J. Aaserud and F. W. McLafferty, Anal . Chem . 67, 3802 (1995). 4. H. R. Padley, S. Bashir and T. D. Wood, Anal . Chem . 69, 2914 (1997). 5. Y. Li and R. T. J. McIver, Rapid Commun . Mass Spectrom . 8, 743 (1994). 6. T. Solouki, J. A. Marto, F. M. White, S. Guan and A. G. Marshall, Anal . Chem . 67, 4139 (1995). 7. S. Lazare, W. Guan and D. Drilhole, Appl . Surf . Sci . 96, 605 (1996). 8. P. O. Danis and D. E. Karr, Org . Mass Spectrom . 28, 923 (1993). 9. G. Montaudo, M. S. Montaudo, C. Puglisi and F. Samperi, Rapid Commun . Mass Spectrom . 8, 1011 (1994). 10. P. O. Danis, D. E. Karr, F. Mayer, A. Holle and C. H. Watson, Org . Mass Spectrom . 27, 843 (1992). ( 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

11. G. Montaudo, M. S. Montaudo, C. Puglisi and F. Samperi, Rapid Commun . Mass Spectrom . 9, 453 (1995). 12. G. Montaudo, D. Garozzo, M. S. Montaudo, C. Puglisi and F. Samperi, Macromolecules 28, 7983 (1995). 13. S. J. Pastor and C. L. Wilkins, J . Am . Soc . Mass Spectrom . 8, 225 (1997). 14. J. A. Castoro, C. KoŽ ster and C. Wilkins, Rapid Commun . Mass Spectrom . 6, 239 (1992). 15. M. S. Kahr and C. L. Wilkins, J . Am . Soc . Mass Spectrom . 4, 453 (1993). 16. C. F. Ijames and C. L. Wilkins, J . Am . Chem . Soc . 110, 2687 (1988). 17. M. Dey, J. A. Castoro and C. L. Wilkins, Anal . Chem . 67, 1575 (1995). 18. P. B. O’Conner, M. C. Duursma, G. J. van Rooij, R. M. A. Heeren and J. J. Boon, Anal . Chem . 69, 2751 (1997). 19. J. Yao, M. Dey, S. J. Pastor and C. L. Wilkins, Anal . Chem . 67, 3638 (1995). 20. J. A. Castoro and C. L. Wilkins, Anal . Chem . 65, 2621 (1993). 21. M. Knobeler and K. P. Wanczek, Int . J . Mass Spectrom . Ion Processes 163, 47 (1997). JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, VOL. 33, 473È479 (1998)

MALDI/FTMS DETECTION LIMITS FOR POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL) 22. F. M. L. Amado, P. Domingues, M. G. Santana-Marques, A. J. Ferrer-Correia and K. B. Tomer, Rapid Commun . Mass Spectrom . 11, 1347 (1997). 23. S. D. Hanton, P. A. Cornelio-Clark and K. G. Owens, in Proceedings of the 45th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics , Palm Springs, CA, 1997, p. 411. 24. K. J. Wu and R. W. Odom, in Proceedings of the 45th ASMS

( 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

479

Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics , Palm Springs, CA, 1997, p. 414. 25. S. J. Pastor, J. A. Castoro and C. L. Wilkins, Anal . Chem . 67, 379 (1995). 26. P. B. O’Conner and F. W. McLafferty, J . Am . Chem . Soc . 117, 12826 (1995).

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, VOL. 33, 473È479 (1998)

View more...

Comments

Copyright © 2017 UPDOC Inc.